WebCommonwealth v. Garcia-Rivera, 983 A.2d 777, 780 (Pa. Super. 2009), quoting Commonwealth v. Hoch, 936 A.2d 515, 517-518 (Pa. Super. 2007). In determining whether a sentence is manifestly excessive, the appellate court must give great weight to the sentencing [judge’s] discretion as he or she is in the best position to measure factors WebSep 27, 2024 · Transcript, 12/3/2024, at p. 4; see also Commonwealth v. Sexton, 222 A.3d 405, 422 (Pa. Super. 2024) (where trial court has the benefit of a presentence report, it is presumed that the trial court “was aware of relevant information regarding the defendant’s character and weighed those
Commonwealth v. Sexton :: 2024 - Justia Law
WebWhen, at the meeting of Sexton and Bradshaw at the latter's office in Beaver about June 20, 1931, Sexton stated he had not been paid, he knew for more than six weeks that the fee … WebMar 7, 2024 · Commonwealth v. Fulton, 830 A.2d 567, 572 (Pa. 2003). Appellant bears the burden of proving each of these elements, and his "failure to satisfy any prong of the … righteous standard
COMMONWEALTH v. SEXTON 41 Mass. App. Ct. 676 Mass. App.
WebCommonwealth v. Sexton Annotate this Case Justia Opinion Summary In this interlocutory appeal from the circuit court’s review of an agency ruling, the Supreme Court adopted the United States Supreme Court’s test for standing as set forth in Lujan v. WebCommonwealth v. Sexton, supra, 246 Pa.Super. at 38,369 A.2d at 799(dissenting opinion). The trial court justified rejecting the abuse of discretion contention on the ground that there is no constitutional right to a pre-trial lineup. The Superior Court dissenters acknowledged the abuse of discretion but concluded that there was no remedy available. WebOct 28, 2024 · Commonwealth v. Seagraves , 103 A.3d 839, 842 (Pa. Super. 2014). With regard to Appellant's assertion that the court erred in imposing a sentence which … righteous symbols